As with all of us, the days since our contemporary Pearl
Harbor of September 11th have been furiously busy in the
task of returning to normal life while adjusting to the
gathering storm. We are filled as well with questions we
didn't expect to have to answer, and answers which have
spontaneously found common voice in all of us, the people
of the United States, and for that matter, civilized people
everywhere: How do we make sure that nothing like September
11th can ever occur again?
With respect to our nation (and for my readers and friends
in so many other nations, I in no way mean to exclude you,
since we're all family in this struggle against inhumanity)
this has been a time of focused fury and careful response.
With a rather mighty voice and a near-unanimity of which
I'm proud, we've been saying very clearly that in no way
are we at war with Islam or other cultures, but that we
are - and shall remain - the blood enemies of those who
have no regard for human life, and specifically those we
esoterically refer to as terrorists.
September 11th was an attack on humanity, and on civilization,
and those who would (for anarchistic reasons or reasons
of stupidity) react as one rag-tag group of alleged students
did in Albuquerque last week in a ridiculous and disloyal
"protest" against war, with associated silly invective against
the United States government, are not only missing the point,
they are aligning themselves with the terrorists whom we
seek to eradicate. I agree entirely with President Bush
that in this fight, you are either with us, or you are with
the terrorists. There is no in-between.
I also agree that this will be a long, difficult, but ultimately
successful "war" which the civilized peoples and governments
of the world will decisively win.
The defiler of Islam in Afghanistan we refer to these days
as Osama bin Laden, and all who follow or support him, are
enemies of mankind, and they have stupidly misjudged U.S.
citizens as having no stomach for war. One of our philosophers,
Jacques Santayana, once said: "He who cannot remember the
past is condemned to repeat it," and this is the classic
mistake bin Laden has made in failing to do his homework
about the fiber of the multi-cultural peoples of the U.S.
We may grow complacent from time to time, and on September
11th we clearly were, but we come from a long line of determined
people who made their way here for the chance to enjoy shaping
their lives as they chose, and going as far as their talents
could take them, and those values will not be surrendered.
Ever. Admiral Yamamoto, of course, understood that basic
mistake in the hours after Pearl Harbor in 1941. Bin Laden,
in his anti-Islamic blood feud with civilization and humanity,
has failed to grasp that reality, and that failure will
prove fatal to him. This isn't bravado or flag waving, it's
simply fact. America is incredibly strong in will because
its people represent all the people and the cultures and
the humane values of the world.
And let's not forget how many Muslims died with Christians
and Jews and men and women who were practitioners of so
many other religions as the WTC towers collapsed. This was
an equal opportunity attack on mankind. Nothing less.
My point is, this is not an American war. This is civilization
determined to eliminate a criminal element which has declared
war on humanity.
Let me turn my attention here to the rapid rehabilitation
of the airline business and all associated aviation operations
in the U.S. As ABC's Aviation Analyst, I have, of course,
been deeply engaged in helping with our coverage of the
attacks, but I've also had the privilege to contribute some
deep thinking and long experience to the collective team
of thousands of aviation people working on rapid solutions
for a problem we never realized we had: the potential of
airborne conversion of a passenger-carrying aircraft to
a guided hostile cruise missile.
At the invitation of former Virginia Governor Baliles and
CCH Issues in Aviation Law and Policy, I've prepared a paper
entitled Denial of Access which CCH is issuing this week
as a special edition, an outline of this article can be
viewed by clicking here. You'll find it gives voice to many
of the same recommendations you've heard from the professional
pilots of our nation and many members of Congress in the
last two weeks, along with some ancillary ideas to solve
the specific problems of forever preventing hostile takeover
of an airborne aircraft by beefing up both airborne and
airport security procedures.
But, is it safe to fly now? That's a legitimate question
I get almost hourly, and the answer is a resounding YES!
Why? For the following reasons, among others:
Having instantaneously thrust all of us in aviation to
a state of high, permanent alert, the terrorist organization
responsible for September 11th will not attempt anything
similar again. In fact, this is validated by the precision
of their planning, and the fact that the one overwhelming
common denominator on September 11th was their attempt to
minimize variables - in other words, to leave almost nothing
to chance. Our airline and security system was abysmally
unprepared for any such threat, and therefore they could
slip through as they did by merely conforming to our rules
(no knife blades over 4", etc), being assured that there
was no real chance of being stopped if they stayed within
the rules. That means they minimized the opportunities to
get caught in our somnambulant system. Today, however, they
would be facing not only great difficulty in getting through
stringent new procedures and rules, but they would also
be stopped by newly reinforced cockpit doors and pilots
behind them who are not going to open those doors. In other
words, post-September 11th, there would be an unacceptable
level of uncertainty that any attack would succeed, and
that uncertainty means that making a target out of an airborne
airliner is simply not feasible. Besides, they don't believe
they need to attack aviation again, because they believe
our paranoia will lead us to destroy our system for them.
While they work on attacking our water supplies, or trying
to create a pandemic with anthrax or some other horrid microorganism,
bin Laden and his fellow criminals fully expect us to ruin
our own airline industry.
And, if we don't drop our fears and get back in the air,
we'll do exactly that!
Virtually all airline pilots in the U.S. have changed their
philosophy regarding on-board hostile activity 100%. Regardless
of what happens in the cabin, and regardless of any hostile
activity, however terrible, against a flight attendant or
passenger in flight, the pilots will no longer come out
of the cockpit or open the door or in any way be intimidated
into granting access to the flight deck. In addition, new
procedures unknown to those who are not professional airmen
have been devised and will be used instantly against anyone
trying to take over a U.S. airliner in flight.
Despite the fact that we still have the bottom-feeding
rag-tag "security" companies doing the screening at airports,
those poorly trained people have been augmented with highly
trained officers and backed up by National Guardsmen, while
Congress grapples with the growing chorus of demands to
federalize all such airport security. Yes, it can and will
be much better in the future, but the level of alert and
the level of additional scrutiny right now means that the
likelihood of any terrorist to get a weapon on board - or
not be caught and detained by a name match or other security
or intelligence tip - is extremely low.
As I told Oprah when she was gracious enough to have me
back on her show on September 18th, I've already been out
flying in the commercial system since September 11th, and
I feel it's akin to a patriotic duty to do so if you've
some place to go (and your name isn't John Madden - John
being the retired football coach and permanently unconvinced
patron saint of fearful flyers).
By the way, I think all of us have to remember that other
than our common mourning of the losses suffered, any changes
for the worse in American life simply hands the enemy a
victory. By the same token, we must not make our airline
system user-unfriendly while we make it terrorist-proof,
or they win there as well.
One element you may not be aware of is what terrible havoc
this has wreaked on private aviation. "Oh, well," one fellow
sniffed last week when I said this in a phone call. "Getting
a bunch of rich guys in their private airplanes back in
the air is a pretty low priority." The misguided statement
stunned me to silence for a few seconds - a rare occurrence
as my close friends can attest - because we live in a nation
that in aviation terms is unlike any other, a nation full
of opportunity for the average American to learn to fly,
own a small plane or a large one, and be able to navigate
around this marvelous continent traversing thousands of
airports, and buying gasoline, jet fuel, and services from
thousands of "FBO's," as they're called. These are the "fixed
base operators," many of them mom-and-pop operations at
a county airport making very little money but providing
great services, and often running a small flying school
out of a deep love for aviation and the freedom to fly.
Just visit Oshkosh, Wisconsin, for the annual Experimental
Aircraft Association's summer convention if you want to
see what the backbone of American aviation is: average folk,
just like you and me, some of them happily camping under
the wing of their tiny single-engine airplane, some in their
homebuilt craft, some in more powerful versions they've
saved a lifetime to buy. The EAA convention also highlights
the fact that our fleet of smaller airplanes is extremely
important to businesses and business people nationwide.
Whether we're discussing physicians widening their practice
through the use of an aircraft, or small companies handling
a multi-state area with small planes, it isn't just business
jets that make private aviation extremely important as an
income-producing business tool. The misguided idea that
private aviation in the United States is an elitist enterprise
is wrong and absurd. Private and business aviation is, in
fact, part of the backbone of America, and I'm very concerned
about all aspects of its economic health. That includes
those thousands of small FBO's that were all but shuttered
for more than ten days while our leaders quite properly
tried to sort out how to safely re-fly the system.
Moreover, we should all be concerned about the continued
prohibition in certain areas of what we call "VFR" flight
- which means flying in clear weather under "Visual Flight
Rules," as opposed to Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) where
the pilots are always in radio contact and positive radar
control. While we must bow to the new world of reality about
the potential for terrorist attacks, we must also realize
that small airplanes can barely make a dent in a large building,
and simply can't be used in any effective manner like our
airliners were used on September 11th. By the same token,
while we must find ways of denying hostile access to crop
dusters, crop duster pilots and companies are yet another
major vertebra in the American backbone, especially for
agriculture.
Finally, the continuous grounding of business and corporate
aviation at certain close-in airports like Teterboro in
New Jersey (across from Manhattan) really must be ameliorated
by striking a reasonable balance between security and a
healthy aviation system. In my view, Teterboro can be safely
reopened with a new form of security background screening,
as can business aviation at Washington National (the FBO
there is now threatened with extinction). Business aviation
is a very, very important aspect of American business, and
not the luxury it may seem from afar. And, yes, I'll readily
admit to bias on this subject, since I fly our own corporate
aircraft (a Beech King Air E-90) to and from many of my
professional speaking engagements and on book tours, but
the truth is that even with my bird (N200RM), its use is
100% business.
One of the messages I'm trying to send here is just this:
We must NOT allow emergency security measures to become
calcified into permanent new rules and procedures and prohibitions
without very careful consideration of whether such new rules
are necessary vis a vis the disruption they may cause. Remember,
any diminution of American life is a victory for our enemies,
and although we must make sacrifices to security in a war,
we must not become the enemy's hostages indirectly by becoming
hostages of our own fears. There are ways to have the security
levels we need, while maintaining our dynamic and healthy
style of doing things, and that includes aviation and our
access as passengers to airline flights that do not require
endless additional hours to board.
Much will be in a state of flux in the next few months,
especially in the usability of the airline system and the
airports. But we must avoid ineffective, bureaucratic, or
"knee-jerk" responses which hurt us and serve no purpose
in the greater fight to prevent terrorism. Do you think,
for instance, that the murderers of September 11th were
going to answer those three bureaucratic and useless questions
incorrectly and thus get caught? (Have you packed your bags
yourself? Has anyone unknown to you given you anything to
carry...etc). These questions may have a place in the grander
scheme of things, but they were always a showboating bureaucratic
fraud on the flying public in that they sought to reassure
without having any hope of being truly effective against
a dedicated terrorist.
Thank you, by the way, for writing the many comments and
kind e-mails you've sent. I am trying to personally answer
each one, but it will take some time.
And, I thank all of you for reading this - from my friends
in the UK and Europe and Ireland, to my mates in Australia
and Canada, and my readers and friends in Africa and Asia
and all over the world - for your heartfelt outpouring of
sympathy and appreciation for the U.S., and for understanding
the ecumenical nature of it when we say 'God Bless the USA.'
- John J. Nance
Back to top
or previous
page