|
JOHN
J. NANCE
INTERVIEWS
Monday, April 24, 1997
Gallivanbn: Welcome, Mr. Nance! Thank you for joining us.
John J. Nance: Thanks. Good to be with you this evening.
Question: What kind of flights have you made lately?
John J. Nance: Well, aside from regular airline flights
as a 737 captain, I'm doing a lot of transition training
in the King Air, a twin-engine turboprop which I own and
fly.
Question: What does it feel like to pilot a 727 full of
people?
John J. Nance: Any turbojet airliner is a joy to fly just
as an aircraft, but one of the most enjoyable aspects of
being an airline pilot is the challenge and responsibility
of keeping over 140 people completely unaware of fact that
they're airborne, in other words, by making the extraordinary
very routine, which is what we do in airline flying. It's
a great and satisfying technological challenge.
Question: What's the scariest thing that's ever happened
while you were piloting?
John J. Nance: I've been asked this numerous times over
the years, and the one I always come back to was a landing
in Denver, Colorado late one afternoon many years ago with
Braniff International when we got into a terrible downburst
on short final. If the captain (a great fellow by the name
of Pete Coberg, I still remember Pete) if he had not brought
all three of his crew members into a discussion on how to
handle the thunderstorm-ridden Denver area, and if we had
not been able to communicate as a team, we would not have
made the decision to add sixty knots to our airspeed. Without
that extra speed, we would without question have crashed
short of the runway. Not only was that one of the first
and most profound exposures for me to windshear, it was
perhaps the first and most profound exposure to the immense
value of teamwork and communications in the cockpit environment.
Question: Have you had any experiences in your flying career
that compare to Captain McKay's?
John J. Nance: Well, certainly no nuclear weapons ticking
off in the back of my aircraft, but the scene with McKay
getting into windshear at the Navy base in Maryland is drawn
from that same experience I mentioned above, and his method
of command and dealing with the challenges of flying an
aircraft in trouble come from both my air force and airline
training and experience.
Question: Will MEDUSA'S CHILD be made into a miniseries
on the scale of PANDORA'S CLOCK?
John J. Nance: You know, after the incredible success of
PANDORA'S CLOCK in the hands of NBC, my own network, ABC
(where I'm Aviation Analyst and Aviation editor for Good
Morning America) has a high hurdle, but it's ABC that will
be doing the 4-hour mini-series on MEDUSA'S CHILD. We do
not yet have a production date or air date, but my producer
is working hard down in Tinseltown to get the show started
and I expect that filming will take about two months.
Question: Do you think the world would really be reduced
to the Stone Ages if all computer chips were obliterated?
John J. Nance: That's a bit of a liner-note overstatement,
to say the least, but the thing I did find in researching
the effects of a massive EMP (electromagnetic pulse on North
America in the late 90's is that the degree of disruption
of our daily lives as well as very, very serious disruption
of our economy and perhaps of the world's economy, was so
grave a threat that it's hard to detail in one book all
the impact it would have. Stop and think for a second how
much of our daily lives are directly affected by, or even
dependent on, computers. Extrapolate that, then, into a
view of what would happen if we couldn't access our bank
accounts, couldn't run computer-controller machinery (which
includes jetliners), and couldn't even operate the major
power grids which are now largely computer controlled. As
I say, the impact would be immense, and I figure it would
be at least six months before the majority of those useless
chips could be replaced nationwide.
Question: What current authors do you look to for a sure-fire
excellent read?
John J. Nance: Well, lately, just for the fun of it, I've
been saying that commercial happiness is seeing John Grisham
in my rearview mirror...but seriously, I do look to John
for continuing excellent reads. Recall that I'm a lawyer
too, so any well-told tale on the stage of law is interesting
to me. I think, also, there is a continuous fascination
on my part in Pat Conroy's incredibly beautiful use of our
language. Prince of Tides, for instance, was masterful in
its use of linguistic imagery, and since the type of high-speed
thrillers I write leave little room for the extra paint
brushing of word pictures that authors such as Conroy can
deliver, I get a bit envious from time to time. Nevertheless,
it's a constant challenge to give my readers the maximum
speed with the best plot and story communicated with the
best use of the language I can manage. I'm getting more
accomplished at this with each book, but you also have to
understand that today the wise editor (and I have a good
one) wonOt let a thriller author get too carried away.
Question: What is the most exhilarating part of flying
for you?
John J. Nance: I'm not sure I can really pin down one part
or another of the flight sequence. Someone once said that
the greatest thrill for man was flying, and the second greatest
was landing. Landing is, indeed, a challenge because we
never get it perfectly smooth and just like we want it every
time, but there have been so many, many hours at altitude
over some three decades of flying -- as a military pilot
(C-141, Air Force), as a commercial pilot, and as a private
pilot, when I've simply sat there looking in awe through
the glass at the incredible beauty of this planet with the
realization that only from altitude can you really get a
feel for its true dimensions.
Question: What are your future plans for writing after
MEDUSA'S CHILD (which I loved)? Can you tell us what you
are working on?
John J. Nance: Certainly. I'm about 1/3 the way through
my next major fiction thriller which will be entitled CASSANDRA'S
SONG, and will be published sometime in 1998 by Doubleday.
I'm proud to say that Doubleday and I concluded a new three-book
contract this year, and Cassandra is the first of that series...and
St. Martin's who has done a wonderful job as my paperback
publisher, is a part of the same three-book deal.
Question: What is the most important part of the writing
process for you?
John J. Nance: The plot. Without question, the plot. Today's
audience is a multi-faceted one that shares a common knowledge
of what good story-telling is, and what it not. They won't
tolerate certain things, including a slow pace or a transparent
predictable plot. Therefore, since my stage is aviation
(never my subject), I work very hard to come up with plots
that no one else has thought of, but ones which involve
the item of universal interest for all of usordinary people
doing extraordinary things in the face of trying circumstance.
When placed on my aviation-oriented stage, these types of
stores become uniquely mine, but the requirements for the
finely-tuned, well-conceived plot remains the most essential
element.
Question: What is your opinion on the crash of TWA?
John J. Nance: I'll tell you what the aviation community
"knows" at this stage, which is basically to repeat what
the National Transportation Safety Board feels as far as
my latest information indicates. Simply put, "we" know the
center fuel tank in TWA 800 blew up, and that the explosion
in the tank provided the motive force for the physical destruction
of the airframe. What no one yet can show is HOW the tank
blew up, or more precisely, what provided the spark which
ignited (explosively) the heated fuel vapors which existed
in the almost empty tank at lift off from Kennedy. Now there
are several possibilities, the most logical one being a
spark inside the tank. Many people erroneously believe that
the fuel boost pumps are physically inside this sort of
tank and could have shorted out. However, boost pumps are
actually outside the tank, and are connected to an impeller
INSIDE the tank through nothing more than an insulated
shaft. Therefore, it's very hard to find a source for the
spark, and while there are theories, there is yet no conclusion.
By the same token it is still possible that a bomb of some
sort imploded the tank and provided the ignition source,
but left behind inadequate traces. Possible, but probable
or not is a hot question at the NTSB. The missile theory,
by the way, has always been 9/10's ludicrous for many reasons
we donOt have time to go into. Possible, barely, but by
no means probable. Finally, it might be possible that a
micrometeorite hit the plane and exploded the tank though
no one at the NTSB is particularly espousing this theory
because of a lack of evidence. So, that's it to date. Will
it be solved? Probably by process of elimination.
Question: Do pilots get better food on the plane than the
passengers?
John J. Nance: Well, depends on the airline. Good question,
by the way. Some airlines provide special menus for their
pilots...including the airline on the west coast I fly for,
and that's great because we can control the cholesterol
levels and fat etc. Some let their pilots have first class
meals only if there are extras, but provide coach meals
otherwise. And in the old days, most were like my previous
carrier - Braniff International - which didn't believe in
feeding pilots. We had to forage for ourselves, which is
to say that we could eat whatever, left over in the cabin
(provided the flight attendants looked after us), but if
the food was gone, we didn't eat. We now know as an industry
that this is a stupid way to do things, because low blood
sugar from not eating does not contribute to the best levels
of performance in a pilot. You do NOT want a tired, hungry
pilot with low blood sugar trying to get your jet on the
ground some dark and stormy night.
Question: What is your favorite book you wrote?
John J. Nance: This is, really, akin to asking which of
my kids I like best. I never thought I would feel like this,
because certainly some books have been more successful than
others but in fact there is always an anthology behind each
work, whether my 4 non-fictions books, or my fiction works,
and therefore it's really impossible to choose among them.
I will say that Pandora did more to put me into orbit than
the book I thought would really be the breakout...PHOENIX
RISING. I loved Phoenix a lot because my central character
was a female, and as a male, I'm just not equipped to know
everything I needed to know to make Elizabeth Sterling (my
lead and the hero of the story) into a completely believable
woman. The solution was to strain as hard as I could to
understand the woman's point of view on everything Elizabeth
encountered, then have my wife and my business partner and
editor (who is female) wield a heavy pen in helping me change
what needed to be changed to make Elizabeth exactly what
she should be a very strong, very feminine woman who had
achieved much in business without ever giving up her femininity.
I'm very proud of that character and of the fact that more
than half my audience is female.
Gallivanbn: Last question folks, thank you for joining
us!
John J. Nance:
Question: If you never flew again, would you be happy just
writing books?
John J. Nance: It would be very hard not to fly again, but
I've made other transitions in life, and through writing
I can use and reuse and let blossom so many of the experiences
that I've had over the past three decades that, yes, it
could be a substitute. Nevertheless, I'm far too involved
in too many things that interest me to sit still and JUST
write. I'm a professional speaker, for instance, and greatly
enjoy that challenge. But, I also must say that I've left
the Air Force C-141 after 23 years and never for a minute
looked back or felt deprived, and I left the Braniff cockpits
(rather, they left me when the company went bankrupt in
1982) and didn't even think about rejoining the airline
industry for three years, so I guess I could do it.
Gallivanbn: Thank you again for coming Mr. Nance. Goodnight
folks!
John J. Nance: Thanks very much. It's been a pleasure being
here.
Back to top
or previous
page.
|